A259 Bognor Regis to Littlehampton Corridor Enhancement Scheme Public Consultation Summary Report and update (September, 2023)
Consultation and Feedback
Various mechanisms were used to promote the public consultation, including:
- Your Voice Engagement Hub website (opens in new tab)
- Email: A259B2L@wsp.com
- A survey questionnaire formed part of the consultation materials.
- Letters were delivered to more than 14,500 properties and businesses.
- Hard copies of consultation materials were made available upon request and available in local libraries.
- FAQs formed part of the consultation materials.
- Social Media, press release and tweet via Facebook and Twitter.
- Drop-in events, both physical and virtual format.
Response Statistics
- 4 face-to-face drop-in events were held at local venues between 23rd and 25th March 2023: 385 attendees
- 2 online events were held on 29th March and 18th April 2023: 8 attendees
- Total online questionnaires returned: 200
- Total hard copy questionnaires returned: 2
- Total feedback by emails/letters: 15
Level of Support by Location shown in 2021 results
Table 1: Percentage of respondents supporting or opposing each proposal in 2023 compared to respondents in 2021.
Location |
Support (% respondents) 2023 results vs 2021 results (in brackets) |
Oppose (% respondents) 2023 results vs 2021 results (in brackets) |
1. Comet Corner | 83 (79) | 7 (13) |
2. Public Right of Way (PRoW) 165 and 166 | 63 (64) | 0 (4) |
3, Baird's Business Park | 59 (56) | 7 (11) |
4. Oystercatcher | 81 (76) | 11 (14) |
5. Church Lane | 70 (61) | 8 (19) |
6. Ferry Road | 64 (62) | 8 (15) |
7. PRoW 206 | 63 (60) | 0 (4) |
8. Clympwick Bridge | 66 (61) | 9 (7) |
9. Bridge Road | 67 (68) | 5 (11) |
Accessible text-based description of Table 1: Percentage of respondents supporting or opposing each proposal in 2023 compared to respondents in 2021.
- Comet Corner: 83% of 2023 survey respondents supported the proposals, compared to 7% of respondents who opposed them. This compares with 79% who supported and 13% who opposed in the 2021 survey.
- PRoW 165 & 166: 63% of 2023 survey respondents supported the proposals, compared to 0% of respondents who opposed them. This compares with 64% who supported and 4% who opposed in the 2021 survey.
- Baird’s Business Park: 59% of 2023 survey respondents supported the proposals, compared to 7% of respondents who opposed them. This compares with 56% who supported and 11% who opposed in the 2021 survey.
- Oystercatcher: 81% of 2023 survey respondents supported the proposals, compared to 11% of respondents who opposed them. This compares with 76% who supported and 14% who opposed in the 2021 survey.
- Church Lane: 70% of 2023 survey respondents supported the proposals, compared to 8% of respondents who opposed them. This compares with 61% who supported and 19% who opposed in the 2021 survey.
- Ferry Road: 64% of 2023 survey respondents supported the proposals, compared to 8% of respondents who opposed them. This compares with 62% who supported and 15% who opposed in the 2021 survey.
- PRoW 206: 63% of 2023 survey respondents supported the proposals, compared to 0% of respondents who opposed them. This compares with 60% who supported and 4% who opposed in the 2021 survey.
- Clympwick Bridge: 66% of 2023 survey respondents supported the proposals, compared to 9% of respondents who opposed them. This compares with 61% who supported and 9% who opposed in the 2021 survey.
- Bridge Road: 67% of 2023 survey respondents supported the proposals, compared to 5% of respondents who opposed them. This compares with 68% who supported and 11% who opposed in the 2021 survey.
Table 2: Priority for Implementation by Location
Priority Order |
Location |
1 |
1: Comet Corner |
2 |
4: Oystercatcher |
3 |
5: Church Lane |
4 |
6: Ferry Road |
5 |
9: Bridge Road |
6 |
8: Clympwick Bridge |
7 |
3: Baird’s Business Park |
8 |
2: PRoW 165 & 166 |
9 |
7: PRoW 206 |
Accessible textual description of Table 2: Priority for Implementation by Location.
The proposed order of priority for implementation by local is as follows:
The first and foremost priority is location 1: Comet Corner
Second is location 4: Oystercatcher
Third is location 5: Church Lane
Fourth is location 6. Ferry Road
Fifth is location 9: Bridge Road
Sixth is location 8 Clympwick Bridge
Seventh is location 3: Baird’s business Park
Eighth is location 2: PRoWs 165 and 166
Nineth is location 7: PRoW 206
Alternative Package
The County Council met with the Department for Transport (DfT) following the public consultation to discuss consultation feedback and the latest scheme cost estimates. It was agreed that the County Council will submit an alternative (lower cost) package of proposals with less locations for the scheme as part of the Outline Business Case (OBC) submission due to inflation, rising costs and DfT’s budgetary constraints. The alternative package will include the following locations:
- Location 1: Comet Corner
- Location 4: Oystercatcher
- Location 5: Church Lane (improvements to developer’s roundabout proposal)
- Location 6: Church Lane
- Location 9: Bridge Road
- Location 11: NCN2 connections between Oystercatcher and Church Lane
- Location 12: A259 corridor speed limit changes between Flansham Lane and Bridge Road roundabouts
Next Steps
The indicative programme going forward is as follows:
- Outline Business Case (OBC) submission to the DfT – October 2023
- Full design and Full Business Case (FBC) development from September 2023 to winter 2024 (note: to meet DfT’s funding requirement, this has started prior OBC approval and it will be stopped should the OBC fail to be approved)
- FBC submission to the DfT – winter 2024
- Start of construction – autumn 2025 (note: this is not guaranteed as the FBC will need to be approved by the DfT).